>Then it's unreasonable for you to assume any intervention to stop Amazon is unwarranted I do not assume that. Maybe they can figure out a reasonable intervent

>Then it's unreasonable for you to assume any intervention to stop Amazon is unwarranted I do not assume that. Maybe they can figure out a reasonable intervention. But the reasons in the article just don't sound honest or strong to me. >but you prefer efficiency above Parisians' quality of life and economic stability. I don't. I think that giving Parisians the option to buy their groceries in more ways, should increase their QOL. And I don't see how it could significantly threaten economic stability. I would love to hear a real argument to the contrary. But it's also fine for me not be convinced, and for you to be. >I've not attacked anybody, I've just shown you the limits of a system of thought based on economic efficiency. Yeah, which no one in their right mind proposes, I certainly did not, and is therefore irrelevant, and an utter strawman. And, as I said before, a classic slippery slope fallacy.