3 ms·
> most of the owners of these in various national institutes are shopping for customers to justify their funding What's the evidence for this claim? AFAIK the
by wsxcde 10y ago
> most of the owners of these in various national institutes are shopping for customers to justify their funding
What's the evidence for this claim? AFAIK the DoE INCITE awards -- which is how you get allocated time on the big supercomputers -- are quite competitive.
Also the supercomputers don't cost billions. Aurora, for example only costs $200 million, and if it lasts as long as its predecessor Mira did, that is $200 million spread over 6 years, which is a pretty small number.
- toomanybeersies 10y agoYour idea of a small number and my idea of a small number are evidently very different.
- yvdriess 10y agoIf you look at supercomputing as a national strategic asset, that is a small number. The K-computer was around the price of a battleship: 1b USD