4 ms·
I totally agree with you, but how does the trademark licensing help with confusion in this case? If they were to pay 1-2e/mo to use the trademark legally, woul
by hoahluke 10y ago
I totally agree with you, but how does the trademark licensing help with confusion in this case?
If they were to pay 1-2e/mo to use the trademark legally, wouldn't the confusion still exist? Or is the full story actually that they have to pay _and_ actually offer it as stock Ubuntu?
- pietroalbini 10y agoAFAIK they must certify their images, which means they should offer a stock or a stock-like image approved by Canonical. Unfortunately the only source we currently have is that tweet, which isn't the clearest one.
- icebraining 10y agoUbuntu's IP policies are public, and you're right, modified versions must be approved by Canonical: http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-...