3 ms·
Only 481 for the literal "dead simple" match: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22dead+simple%22+site%3Atechcrunch.com&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= http://www.google
by stingraycharles 17y ago
Only 481 for the literal "dead simple" match:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22dead+simple%22+site%3Atechcrunch.com&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22dead+simple%22+s...
Still a lot, but not nearly as much.
- stcredzero 17y agoWe can make TechCrunch even geekier by moving to the "undead simple" scale. Is the app usable by a Zombie or animated skeleton? Or would one need to be as smart as a vampire? This would have the side-effect of converting TC into /. Desirability of that varies greatly depending on whom you ask.
- JarekS 17y agoNo to long time ago I wrote this post about Simple and Easy in the tech world http://blog.smartupz.com/2010/03/simple-and-easy-as-terms-are-overused.html http://blog.smartupz.com/2010/03/simple-and-easy-as-terms-ar...
- stcredzero 17y agoWent there, but didn't find any D+D references.