3 ms·

Ha! ... quick turn around by Fortune, http://fortune.com/2016/06/18/palantir-hack-buzzfeed/ http://fortune.com/2016/06/18/palantir-hack-buzzfeed/ Bizarre to wa

• argonaut 10y ago
  You haven't actually commented on the actual content of the Buzzfeed article or the Fortune article, but instead have decided to go the route of putting forth FUD about sockpuppets and media manipulation.
  • deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
    • argonaut 10y ago
      How do you know Buzzfeed's source isn't a competitor with an axe to grind? You don't. So this almost-unfalsifiable FUD is useless.
      • deleted 10y ago
        [deleted]
        • argonaut 10y ago
          How do you know Buzzfeed's source isn't a disgruntled employee with an axe to grind? So this almost-unfalsifiable FUD is useless.
    • deleted 10y ago
      [deleted]
• chrisdbaldwin 10y ago
  It's like a scene out of a Silicon Valley episode.
• meowface 10y ago
  Before I read the Fortune article, their remarks were pretty much my initial reaction to the article. Any company that hires sufficiently good pentesters is going to get breached, even an infosec company. I would bet NSA probably does pretty poorly, even to this day, on their annual pentests. This isn't really news. A company that successfully fends off multiple independent pentests would be news. I've worked for a company that actually did quite well on one pentest, but the testers were pretty terrible.
• onewaystreet 10y ago
  Except that the Fortune article has the benefit of being 100% correct.