3 ms·
Nah, I grow up there. I knew the people. Using a Game of Throne analogy, Tibetan people are like free folks (or wildings) and Han people are like people south o
by huahaiy 10y ago
Nah, I grow up there. I knew the people. Using a Game of Throne analogy, Tibetan people are like free folks (or wildings) and Han people are like people south of the wall. When I was there growing up, every male Tibetan carry weapons (including boys) on their body. They are a militant people, yes they are deviant Buddhists too, but that doesn't mean they are not militant.
- yongjik 10y agoHow funny. In some Korean websites I visit, I regularly see posts about Chinese workers carrying knives everywhere and how they're being a "menace" to the Korean society. I guess demonizing neighbors is a universal human tendency.
- huahaiy 10y agoNot really. Chinese in Korean is in a foreign land as a minority. Tibetan carries weapons on their own land as a majority, minority Han there do not carry weapon on their body (but they do keep firearms at home, especially officials).
- lostlogin 10y agoCan I ask if you are Han on Tibetian? To use an analogy that puts the Tibetians as the savage outsiders suggests you come from the civilised "good" side. Even if Tibetians are militant, they were invaded, surely that says something about their oppressors?
- huahaiy 10y agoIt should be obvious that I am Han. I agree that this analogy would give some people an impression that I considered Tibetans savages. But no, that's not how I saw it. The way I saw them is not unlike the way Jon Snow saw the free folks. Tibetan and Han actually share the same ancestry. We happened to be separated by a natural barrier (unlike the wall in GOT that is man made) only a couple thousands years ago. We are basically the same people.
- lostlogin 10y ago> It should be obvious that I am Han Doesn't hurt to check!
- huahaiy 10y agoIf I were a Tibetan and had earned a Ph.D. in US. I probably would have been a member of the Tibetan elite, I would not be writing in the HN comments section here, but in the NYT opinion section to condemn the Chinese government by now. Wouldn't that be more realistic? I am sure my cousin in law would not agree with whatever I could have written in NYT as a member of the Tibetan elite though. What I am saying is that the elite may not represents the best interests of the people they claim to represent.
- lostlogin 10y agoThat statement applies to you being Han too - your level of education puts you into an elite category I'd have thought?
- huahaiy 10y agoThis is the thing. With the same background and education, I am a nobody when I am Han, and I am speaking for myself, not representing anyone. That would not be the case when I am Tibetan. I would be given a platform to broadcast my dissatisfaction with Chinese government, so on and so forth. What does this tell you?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- lostlogin 10y ago> With the same background and education, I am a nobody when I am Han, and I am speaking for myself, not representing anyone. Why is this? Because of the government structure?