Legally this all seems very esoteric and shaky. Philosophically I wonder about this "the exact code defines the semantics of the DAO" clause because, well, nob

Legally this all seems very esoteric and shaky. Philosophically I wonder about this "the exact code defines the semantics of the DAO" clause because, well, nobody's suggesting to change the code; the fork proposals would just change how the code is interpreted. Kind of like "this exact Java code defines the terms of the contract" but then a new version of Java makes that code behave differently... So the clause depends not only on the Solidity code but also on the Ethereum virtual machine's interpretation of that code, and the question now is whether that interpretation is constant or mutable. And, like, what's even the legal status of the https://daohub.org/explainer.html https://daohub.org/explainer.html document? It has a list of things to which anyone who interacts with "The DAO" supposedly agrees, which seems like a typical groundless EULA and anyone who "invested" could just say "uh, I didn't agree to any of that stuff". I'm not really making an argument, I just find it bewildering to even imagine how any of this stuff would be interpreted by lawyers.