3 ms·
> Feeling any sympathy yet? :) No, because if you skimmed it and then decided to say it was confusable with the prior art of communications satellites, you've
by johncolanduoni 10y ago
> Feeling any sympathy yet? :)
No, because if you skimmed it and then decided to say it was confusable with the prior art of communications satellites, you've just shifted from being lazy to plain disingenuous.
> NDA's almost always say things like this (from an NDA we've signed):
And you've read their NDA? I don't know how much more I have to couch things with allege and supposedly. I have no idea if they're blowing smoke up Google's ass or if they have a real claim. But you sure as hell don't have any evidence to write them off as confidently as you have been.
- themartorana 10y agoSomeone wrote up on the wrong side of the judgemental bed today. I'm sorry I didn't print out the patent, stash it away, go get a law degree, come back, study it, get a second opinion, and then comment, but hey, neither did anyone here, and yet HN survives. I read enough to know I disagreed with it. I have been in business long enough to know you don't sign an NDA that doesn't cover internal prior art. I know you think you have a grasp on my ability to comment intelligently on patents and NDAs, but you are mistaken. And be careful who you call disingenuous. It's an insult of a pretty high order, and were I a lesser person, I might have taken it personally.