3 ms·

Picture says a thousand words. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/56530521e4b0c307d59bbe97/t/56af97fda3360cecbfe34b0e/1454348294881/ http://static1.squarespa

Picture says a thousand words. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/56530521e4b0c307d59bbe97/t/56af97fda3360cecbfe34b0e/1454348294881/ http://static1.squarespace.com/static/56530521e4b0c307d59bbe... I get the impression that because you have not heard of this you deny it? http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p005xgcj http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p005xgcj "As the Sun ages, it will gradually become a red giant as its hydrogen fuel begins to run out. Its surface will expand to approximately 100 times its current size as its core shrinks, and the inner Solar System will be engulfed." >So far as I know, there is no reason to think that solar minima cause volcanic activity Apart from the fact volcanic activity stepped up during the last event. >Whose estimates? Read the book by Professor Fagan. Its a long read but worth it. >It looks very much as if you do. Far from it, unless you believe in not informing the public. The IPCC were hacked and exposed. Worth understanding Milgram's obedience to authority. Just whose data do you trust?

gjm11 10y ago
> Picture says a thousand words It might have been better if you'd supplied some of those words, because that picture doesn't appear to me to indicate anything on the way as major as the Dalton, let alone the Maunder, minimum. > As the Sun ages [...] Yeah, oddly enough that isn't what I was questioning. You made two claims that are just flatly wrong. (1) That the sun is going to go supernova. Nope, not happening. Wrong sort of star. (2) That increases in the sun's temperature on its way to this alleged supernova are "what alot of the global warming fear is based on". The sun's temperature and luminosity aren't going to change appreciably on a timescale shorter than many million years. > The IPCC were hacked and exposed. What? (Are you mixing up the IPCC with the UEA CRU? The two are entirely different, and the hacks didn't "expose" anything to speak of.)
Oletros 10y ago
> Picture says a thousand words. And what we suppose to see in that picture? > "As the Sun ages, it will gradually become a red giant as its hydrogen fuel begins to run out. Its surface will expand to approximately 100 times its current size as its core shrinks, and the inner Solar System will be engulfed." Apart that the Sun won't become a supernova, are you aware of the timeframe involved? It will happen in 5 BILLION years. If you say that global warming alarmism is related to that you're very disillusional. > Apart from the fact volcanic activity stepped up during the last event. Correlation is not causation. If you're so sure, you can provide any paper studying it. > Read the book by Professor Fagan. Its a long read but worth it. So, no single source, you're made it up. > The IPCC were hacked and exposed. Do you really know anything about what you talk? Apart that the IPCC has never been hacked, the ones hacked were the University of East Anglia and nothing was exposed.

gjm11 10y ago

> Picture says a thousand words It might have been better if you'd supplied some of those words, because that picture doesn't appear to me to indicate anything on the way as major as the Dalton, let alone the Maunder, minimum. > As the Sun ages [...] Yeah, oddly enough that isn't what I was questioning. You made two claims that are just flatly wrong. (1) That the sun is going to go supernova. Nope, not happening. Wrong sort of star. (2) That increases in the sun's temperature on its way to this alleged supernova are "what alot of the global warming fear is based on". The sun's temperature and luminosity aren't going to change appreciably on a timescale shorter than many million years. > The IPCC were hacked and exposed. What? (Are you mixing up the IPCC with the UEA CRU? The two are entirely different, and the hacks didn't "expose" anything to speak of.)

Oletros 10y ago

> Picture says a thousand words. And what we suppose to see in that picture? > "As the Sun ages, it will gradually become a red giant as its hydrogen fuel begins to run out. Its surface will expand to approximately 100 times its current size as its core shrinks, and the inner Solar System will be engulfed." Apart that the Sun won't become a supernova, are you aware of the timeframe involved? It will happen in 5 BILLION years. If you say that global warming alarmism is related to that you're very disillusional. > Apart from the fact volcanic activity stepped up during the last event. Correlation is not causation. If you're so sure, you can provide any paper studying it. > Read the book by Professor Fagan. Its a long read but worth it. So, no single source, you're made it up. > The IPCC were hacked and exposed. Do you really know anything about what you talk? Apart that the IPCC has never been hacked, the ones hacked were the University of East Anglia and nothing was exposed.