> They can say they'd have Google's business if Google hadn't signed NDAs, learned their trade secrets, then decided to do it in-house. This seems like the iss

> They can say they'd have Google's business if Google hadn't signed NDAs, learned their trade secrets, then decided to do it in-house. This seems like the issue to me, they can say they'd have Google's Loon business. But that's 0 actual business. I don't see how they can possibly claim they'd have Google's advertising business since it's obviously completely unrelated to what they do.