3 ms·
I don't mean "troll" as an insult here. I mean it as the description of the activity that is not about opinions it is about facts. Usually there could be a gra
by d0mine 10y ago
I don't mean "troll" as an insult here. I mean it as the description of the activity that is not about opinions it is about facts.
Usually there could be a gray area where it is not clear whether some online activity can be classified as trolling -- r/The_Donald is not one these cases -- the signal is very clear. You could use any common definition e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
Though some of the submissions might be genuine (given the demographic) due to Poe's law (extreme views and their parody are hard to distinguish) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law