3 ms·
AFAIR if you have a single excited particle, you still get this polynomial decay. (It was more about every distribution and Fourier transform properties - as me
by stared 10y ago
AFAIR if you have a single excited particle, you still get this polynomial decay. (It was more about every distribution and Fourier transform properties - as mentioned in the post.)
Yes, in these subtle effects backaction may be important. (The whole non-exponential decay is because the "emitted" EM field acts back on the particle.)
- pdonis 10y ago> AFAIR if you have a single excited particle, you still get this polynomial decay. I'm not seeing that in the linked papers. I'm seeing descriptions of exponential decay under certain conditions, and deviations from that under other conditions.