3 ms·
>Few people took a stand against her when she made those bets I'd like to know why you think that nobody wanted to call her out publicly. I'm not disagreeing w
by xenihn 10y ago
>Few people took a stand against her when she made those bets
I'd like to know why you think that nobody wanted to call her out publicly. I'm not disagreeing with you, I just want to know your opinion in regards to why people kept quiet.
- asimuvPR 10y agoPeople kept quiet? I'm not a Mayer apologist (or even a "fan"), but she has been criticized for everything. From her looks (people said she is a dumb blonde who is going to wreck everything) to her decisions (everyone knew tumblr was a bad idea). I have even read about people saying that Google offloaded her to Yahoo in order to sink them. All of this right here on HN. So no, they did not keep quiet. They've treated her worse than Jobs. Who by the way, conspired with others to pay tech workers less...
- whack 10y agoI think people kept quiet because most of what she did seemed reasonable at the time. When you're suddenly put in charge of a sinking ship, you need to make big risky bets in order to turn things around. When you're managing a company worth tens of billions of dollars, obsessing over a few ten million dollars seems penny wise and pound foolish. She didn't make any obvious mistakes, which is why there was no consensus that she was doing a bad job. But now that everyone knows the outcome, people seem to have known better all along. If I'm reading the subtext of your post correctly, you're insinuating that people didn't want to call her out publicly because they didn't want to seem sexist? If so, that certainly hasn't stopped people from taking potshots at her now.