2 ms·

I see the assertion that far-flung rail is superior to air or car travel. I've lived in Europe, and while I admittedly used the rail system quite a bit... it wa

by enjo 17y ago

I see the assertion that far-flung rail is superior to air or car travel. I've lived in Europe, and while I admittedly used the rail system quite a bit... it was more a matter of economics. With Southwest flying basically anywhere in the nation, why does far flung high speed rail make sense? High speed commuter rail, sure. Connecting Portland to Seattle? Absolutely. But we have the most sophisticated flight network in the world. Why is that such a bad thing?

fnid2 17y ago
It's not "bad," but trains are better. For example, it's very easy to work on a laptop on a train and very difficult on a plane. At best your bag is under the seat in front of you and cramping you and you get interrupted to take off and land. Outlets are difficult, so batteries die. Trains have plugs and wireless internet, sometimes. It's easier to pack more stuff. The process is easier, no lines to wait in, just get on the train.