3 ms·
I don't read Chinese and the patent isn't translated. Anyone have any idea what Apple violated? It's interesting, in a country where you HAVE to give up IP to c
by BFatts 10y ago
I don't read Chinese and the patent isn't translated. Anyone have any idea what Apple violated? It's interesting, in a country where you HAVE to give up IP to competing companies to enter the market, that there can be any IP disputes - considering much of what Apple has done is directly copied into Chinese goods.
If that rule didn't exist, China would be a 3rd world economy still stuck making shitty goods.
- nxzero 10y agoReally not that true; meaning yes, China copies a lot, but so does everyone and being able to copy someone takes skill. Look no further that the American auto industry for a historical example of this.
- analog31 10y agoWhere did you find the patent? If it's anything like a US design patent, then you should be able to learn a lot just by looking at the pictures.
- mkagenius 10y agoHe is perhaps referring to what the court's ruling said - http://www.bjipo.gov.cn/zlzf/zfjggg/201605/P020160609372965002381.pdf http://www.bjipo.gov.cn/zlzf/zfjggg/201605/P0201606093729650...
- WildUtah 10y ago1. China isn't and hasn't been third world by definition. It's second world. 2. Lots of E Asian countries with similar workforces developed without stealing IP. The strong arm tactics against foreigners are a way for the Chinese government to control local industries, not to grow them. It slows down economic development but keeps it under the thumb of the Communist Party.
- joelwilliamson 10y agoAfter the Sino-Soviet split, China was a third world country