This "study" is yet another spurious correlation with no evidence of causation. It observes that paper trails are negatively correlated with support for Clinton

This "study" is yet another spurious correlation with no evidence of causation. It observes that paper trails are negatively correlated with support for Clinton. As it happens, the states without paper trails happen to be mostly in the south, where Clinton enjoys the most support. I'm not sure why southern states resist paper trails, but whatever the reason, it is not because of fraud on the part of the Clinton campaign.