3 ms·
I hope they revert this; the columns visualized decidedly different metrics (personal projects vs community contribution) and each was useful in its own right.
by sylphaenos 10y ago
I hope they revert this; the columns visualized decidedly different metrics (personal projects vs community contribution) and each was useful in its own right. Pinning each section separately would have made more sense.
- samuell 10y agoDepends, IMO. I got a few projects which I for various reasons (simplify collaboration, or have a neutral home, amidst multiple parties (me, research group, few virtual orgs etc)) forked off into separate github orgs, but still was the main developer for. Then, the separation didn't feel optimal.
- geerlingguy 10y agoDitto—I feel like this is more optimized for the use case where people don't have 'personal' repos and want to give more weight to contributions to other projects. But what it does (imo) is make it look like someone who's only ever submitted one patch to any project be able to put that project as one of their primary 'pinned' projects. So now it's harder for people to tell if something like whether I am a primary contributor to the `ansible/ansible` project, or if I'm just sticking it in my pinned list for vanity reasons.
- mythz 10y agoSame, the 2-column layout shows twice as much info and separates your personal repo's with the repo's you're a major contributor to - hope they provide an option where we can out-out of this change, showing most popular personal repo's and repo's you contribute to was just fine the way it was.