4 ms·
Clean and simple. I like it. For a more advanced puzzle, you could also put kanji instead of romaji in the "word list" (basically it would be a test of the user
by quant18 17y ago
Clean and simple. I like it. For a more advanced puzzle, you could also put kanji instead of romaji in the "word list" (basically it would be a test of the user's ability to remember how the kanji were read.)
One bug I noticed --- it is showing ぢ for "ji". Except in a very few cases, that should be じ. "zu" should also usually be ず (but づ is not uncommon, e.g. つづける).
If you're gonna keep working on it, EDICT (a Japanese-English dictionary) may be helpful --- the data is freely reusable for both commercial and non-commercial purposes:
http://www.edrdg.org/ http://www.edrdg.org/
- trydionel 17y agoYea, the romanization rules are only approximate at best. It won't properly transcribe 'doozo' either. I'd like to support some more advanced translations, but I'm trying to take baby steps -- both with the language and the program! I've visited EDICT once or twice so far, but didn't realize they allowed reuse of their data. I'll pursue that further! Thanks for the suggestions :)
- donw 17y agoI've done a lot of work with the EDICT data, so shoot me a message if you run into any weirdness: don AT madwombat.com