3 ms·
Mergers are hard, and "big company buys small company and derails it" is a common story, in every industry. Some historians of the automobile industry (Paul In
by lkrubner 10y ago
Mergers are hard, and "big company buys small company and derails it" is a common story, in every industry.
Some historians of the automobile industry (Paul Ingrassia) suggest that Oldsmobile would have gone much further if it had remained an independent company. Wikipedia points out it was the #1 car company, shortly before it was bought:
"In 1901, the company produced 425 cars, making it the first high-volume gasoline-powered automobile manufacturer. (Electric car manufacturers such as Columbia Electric and steam powered car manufacturers such as Locomobile had higher volumes a few years earlier). Oldsmobile became the top selling car company in the United States for a few years around 1903-4... General Motors purchased the company in 1908."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldsmobile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldsmobile
John F. Love points out that in mid 1960s Burger King was building twice as many restaurants as McDonalds, and was on track to surpass McDonalds by the end of the 60s. At that time, Burger King had very smart management. However, Burger King was then bought by Hormel, who regarded it as simply a place to dump surplus beef that couldn't be sold through other channels. And that is why McDonalds is the #1 burger company.
The software industry is full of such stories. Roomkey.com (it's pre-purchase name was Hotelicopter) might have transformed the hotel industry, but it was bought by a joint venture of Choice Hotels, Hilton Worldwide, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, InterContinental Hotels Group, Marriott International, and Wyndham Worldwide. This joint venture regards Roomkey merely as a bargaining chip to get better rates from Expedia ("Give us better rates or we will invest more in Roomkey".)
I could try to list all the innovative startups that Cisco has bought, cannibalized, and then discarded, but it would take me all day.
Mergers are the main way that innovation is destroyed in our society. Over and over again small startups are bought, and then killed by the different needs of the new owners.
- Doctor_Fegg 10y agoJust for the record (because it's interesting), it was Pillsbury who bought Burger King, not Hormel. Same applies, though.
- seanp2k2 10y agoI don't want to be a negative nancy here, but does anyone have any examples, preferably in the past 10 years, where a company with cool tech was acquired and did even better because of the acquisition? A company which really thrived and wouldn't have without being acquired? Things like Nest make me cynical that the vast majority of acquisitions end up destroying all the value created before the acquisition by the acquiree. Edit: Android might be an example acquisition success story.
- thenewwazoo 10y agoWell, the answer is "it depends". Lots of acquisitions become features. Others succeed after a rebranding, so it's hard to tease out what qualifies as "thriving". Off the top of my head examples: * Google Maps (Where 2 Technologies) * Siri (Siri Inc) * Visio (Visio Inc) * Firefox (born of post-acquisition AoL money)
- niftich 10y agoAndroid, Youtube, DoubleClick, Summize (to Twitter) [1], Instagram, WhatsApp [1] http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/7/twitter-buys-summize-for-about-15m-stock-and-cash http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/7/twitter-buys-summize-f...