4 ms·
I assure you, I'm no shill. Like I said, RamNode does very well in benchmarks. My problem with them is that after being hacked, exposing my personal informatio
by Veratyr 10y ago
I assure you, I'm no shill. Like I said, RamNode does very well in benchmarks.
My problem with them is that after being hacked, exposing my personal information, they refused to remove it, citing nebulous "legal reasons" compelling them to retain it (which similar hosts had no issues with).
Frankly I haven't had another exchange with their support, so I can't comment on their service beyond good benchmarks, terrible privacy/security (they're still on SolusVM as far as I know).
- ryanlol 10y agoNot only that, they've got a pretty interesting attitude to user information in general. http://imgur.com/a/TVVXq http://imgur.com/a/TVVXq Here's a ticket conversation between the CEO of ramnode and a customer where the CEO Nick essentially attempts to extort the customer for information on one of his friends (me)
- Veratyr 10y agoWow, that's appalling behaviour from the CEO of the company. I can't say I'm surprised though, that was roughly what I expect from him after my own interactions.
- cpqq 10y agoBunch of David Aninowsky's friends in here and shills, RamNode is a legitimate provider.
- Veratyr 10y agoWe're just customers with bad experiences. There are even screenshots of emails with the RamNode CEO. Is it really that surprising to you that not everyone is happy with RamNode? We didn't say that RamNode is an illegitimate provider either. If you're happy with being blackmailed by your hosting company's CEO and surrendering your personal information indefinitely, then RamNode may be the company for you! And is it really surprising that people unhappy with RamNode would find and be happy with a competitor? It's not like they suddenly decide they don't need servers anymore.