3 ms·
>> It seems much less invasive than the public surveillance cameras that are becoming ubiquitous. They can't identify faces or cars yet >> Irrational or not,
by mattnewton 10y ago
>> It seems much less invasive than the public surveillance cameras that are becoming ubiquitous. They can't identify faces or cars
yet
>> Irrational or not, anything that decreases people's fear without being too invasive is a huge positive.
I don't think people really live in that much fear, or should. I also don't want their fear to dictate what my definition of invasive is.
- whoopdedo 10y agoViolent crime in the U.S. may be like Lisa Simpson's "bear rock". The if-it-bleeds-it-leads media makes crime appear to be more common than it actually is. The public then ask for law enforcement to protect them from this threat. When they see the low rates of violent crime around them, they assume it's a result of the increased policing.