3 ms·
"It's kind of a shame that ZFS hasn't seen better adoption" We[1] are full steam ahead! We transitioned all of rsync.net, globally, to ZFS starting in ate 201
by rsync 10y ago
"It's kind of a shame that ZFS hasn't seen better adoption"
We[1] are full steam ahead!
We transitioned all of rsync.net, globally, to ZFS starting in ate 2012. After that, we began offering zfs send and receive (over ssh, of course) into rsync.net filesystems[2].
It's working wonderfully. We have many, many customers that do extremely efficient backups of very large zpools/snapshots into the rsync.net location of their choice. It's been tested and reviewed favorably in the press.[3]
[1] rsync.net
[2] http://www.rsync.net/products/zfsintro.html http://www.rsync.net/products/zfsintro.html
[3] https://0x.co/G36YPW https://0x.co/G36YPW
- rsync 10y agoYep, used an "Oh By Code" as a shortener for that arstechnica link ... URL shortening is a secondary use-case: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11896717 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11896717