There are vaguely plausible arguments for mass surveillance, but this is just incoherent. It doesn't actually propose anything other than "shut up about privacy

There are vaguely plausible arguments for mass surveillance, but this is just incoherent. It doesn't actually propose anything other than "shut up about privacy". The Orlando scumbag was brought to the attention of the FBI twice without the need to monitor everyone's communications. Doing what the author seems to want (again, it's hard to tell what that is) would result in a vast increase in false positives, making it even easier for future terrorists to slip through the cracks.