3 ms·
1) It would be ridiculously unfair to people that would benefit from AI most: 6 billion of poor people living lives that are unimaginably unpleasant to a wester
by sapphireblue 10y ago
1) It would be ridiculously unfair to people that would benefit from AI most: 6 billion of poor people living lives that are unimaginably unpleasant to a western person.
2) Hype about "superintelligent AI coming soon" is pretty much unfounded, current deep learning approaches have a lot of limits, hardware progress stalled as well (moore's law is officially dead). AI technology is like a fragile flower on a life support, it is so weak you can easily kill it with regulation and FUD. Instead of questioning if we suddenly achieve "real AI" one could wonder if the tech will ever reach any level of moderate general AI, considering the death of moore's law.
3) Nobody will listen to scaremongering, people will just continue doing their thing anyway.
- RIPKingSteelo 10y agoThanks for your response. I realize my wording may have seemed a tad strong. My hope was not that we use fear tactics, but rather begin a global conversation regarding: ideal off limit zones for implementation (ie military uses & surveillance), how we can implement said technology in order to address climate degradation and limit waste and how it could provide us with the capacity to reenvision our global economy.