4 ms·
> In fact, children under 15 are about 40 times more likely to die by swimming pool than by an accidental firearms discharge [0]. You know, it's not really the
by finnh 10y ago
> In fact, children under 15 are about 40 times more likely to die by swimming pool than by an accidental firearms discharge [0].
You know, it's not really the accidental discharges I'm worried about. It's the mass shootings.
Also, you appear to be misquoting that article. The 40x number is scaled by the number of pools/firearms, and so is saying "an individual firearm is less likely to kill a child than an individual pool" (although firearms are vastly more common than pools).
And, finally, that article uses "86 children killed by accidental firearm discharge in 2000" as its primary metric. The top google hit [0] for "How many children are killed each year by guns?" gives a value of 1,500.
[0] https://www.google.com/search?q=How+many+children+are+killed+each+year+by+guns https://www.google.com/search?q=How+many+children+are+killed...
- diek 10y agoIt looks like the 1,500 number includes all deaths of children under 18. However -- without going into that particular dataset -- these numbers are normally inflated by gang violence and include 17-year-olds killed in shootouts with police. I'm certainly interested in more data, but it's hard to find summary datasets that aren't slanted.