4 ms·
If/when wikileaks begins to talk then we'll know if it was a legit leak. The docs listed aren't the full dump, just "proof" that there is more.
by 0xCMP 10y ago
If/when wikileaks begins to talk then we'll know if it was a legit leak.
The docs listed aren't the full dump, just "proof" that there is more.
- eli 10y agoWikileaks is hardly a reliable and impartial third party.
- BinaryIdiot 10y agoCorrect but if it happens it'll likely contain enough data to better verify its origin.
- dr_hooo 10y agoGenuinely curious: have WL released unreliable information in the past?
- jayess 10y agoTheir collateral murder video that claimed to show photographers being killed but ignored or edited out the frames showing someone with an RPG and an AK47 in the same group.
- linkregister 10y agoThis fact is rarely mentioned. Thanks for bringing it up. This editing was not done by Chelsea; she submitted the information as-is. It was indeed WL / Assange who edited the video.
- EdHominem 10y agoNo, the edited video had all the critical details. And, unlike any other journalists, they released the unedited video as well.