4 ms·
I'm not sure why you say it's "BS in terms of engineering." The tick/tock is done for both business and engineering reasons. Debugging new silicon is hard enou
by tophercyll 17y ago
I'm not sure why you say it's "BS in terms of engineering."
The tick/tock is done for both business and engineering reasons. Debugging new silicon is hard enough without landing a new microarchitecture and a new process simultaneously.
While the ticks (new process) aren't quite as exciting as the tocks (new architecture), they bring real benefits in cost, power, and increased perf, not to mention usually a few microarchitectural enhancements. These chips are the best of their uarch, and they pave the way for the next tock, as you point out.
Disclaimer: I used to work for Intel's Oregon CPU Architecture Team in the performance group, but that was more than three years ago, so take what I say with a grain of salt. And, of course, I don't speak for Intel in any way.
- mnemonicsloth 17y agoIt's good engineering. Obviously right. The name is BS. Making one change at a time is universal engineering practice. Who names that? Marketers. Or "maybe Tick Tock" originated as a slogan for management. Which would've been a pretty cool hack, come to think about it. Keep the MBAs away from your functioning process by giving it a cool name and telling them it's a company secret.