> There are no conflicting benchmarks, synthetic benchmarks are never a good indicator of actual gameplay performance, and passmark is the one of worst benchmar

> There are no conflicting benchmarks, synthetic benchmarks are never a good indicator of actual gameplay performance, and passmark is the one of worst benchmarks to begin with. I have found passmark to be excellence in predicting real-world performance for both GPUs and CPUs. I believe that it is because the game FPS benchmarks are testing things other than just pure GPU performance -- which is okay if you care about those specific games, but it then isn't an indicator of GPU performance. In many games the GeForce 760 doubles the Iris 580 performance as it does in the PassMark ratings: http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph10343/bioshock_ps.png http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph10343/bioshock_ps.pn... The issue with these benchmarks is that they all have different CPUs, different memory speeds, buses, etc. It is very much not apples-to-apples.