3 ms·
A restriction on working hours is only going to be useful if you have, or aim to create, an adversarial relationship with your employer. People are, by and lar
by UVB-76 10y ago
A restriction on working hours is only going to be useful if you have, or aim to create, an adversarial relationship with your employer.
People are, by and large, aware of what they are getting into when they start a new job, and working hours are a factor in most remuneration calculations.
If the working hours are simply too much for you, then you should find a different job.
- Thimothy 10y agoI'd say that, if the employer doesn't cover a need with a full-time employee working a healthy amount of time, he/she should hire another employee, full or partial time. Thus, unemployment is reduced, more money is put into the economy and the full automation apocalypse is delayed for a little bit. And if another employee can't be paid, then that business is not really viable and should close.
- vidarh 10y agoAnd for anyone expecting shorter working hours to lead to the apocalypse: They should consider that France, the canonical UK example of "too strict" working time restrictions, for the vast majority of the last 50 years or so have had a higher GDP per capita than the UK (their GDP per capita was lower for a few recent years, but then they overtook again).
- vidarh 10y agoIf you actually believe this, count yourself lucky to be so privileged. Given all the shit I've heard from HR people over the years, it is a hopelessly naive viewpoint.