6 ms·

> 4) 9.7" 2048x1536 DisplayPort Monitor (Adafruit Qualia kit) That monitor is horribly overpriced for what you get. The LCD can be purchased in QTY 1 from Ali

> 4) 9.7" 2048x1536 DisplayPort Monitor (Adafruit Qualia kit) That monitor is horribly overpriced for what you get. The LCD can be purchased in QTY 1 from AliExpress for $25 USD with free shipping to almost anywhere in the world. [1] A guy in Japan makes a DP board which is better than the Adafruit one and which you can buy for about $40 USD shipped from Japan (3,500 JPY + 800 JPY shipping). [2] I've bought 5 so far and they all work great. One was DOA but the seller kindly shipped me a replacement free of charge. It's also 5V powered, so you can power it directly from the computer using a USB cable, no need for an extra 9V (seriously, 9V. why?) power supply. You can easily laser cut a stand from plywood or lexan to mount the LCD. Or, you can buy the actual iPad aluminium housing ($22 + $8 for the digitizer glass) and mount the adapter on the back. It really bothers me that Adafruit is selling that kit for $225 when you can build one yourself for well under $100. Their profit margins must be insane. [1] http://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=SB_20160615051558&SearchText=LP097qx1 http://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?catId=0&initiative_id=SB... (If the link is broken, just search AliExpress for the LP097QX1) [2] http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=3&products_id=47&zenid=lcgtihp4gkkl5a14ub8tic3c45 http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&...

coredog64 10y ago
I've made one as well (using the iPad housing). The most difficult part is mounting the adapter on the back: The cable from the panel is somewhat short and I had to pay an extortionate price to get the right size standoffs that were short enough not to stress the cable. It would be helpful if someone published the slot location/dimensions (hint, hint). When I started, I emailed Adafruit about selling the stand separate from the kit. They mentioned they'd take it under advisement, and that was the end of it.
- jpt4 10y ago
  I take it a CAD model of the stand parts would satisfy your hinted desire?
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
fhood 10y ago
I am sure that most people are aware of how overpriced adafruit is. I still use them when I prototype because they test their products, their website is a fun place to visit, and they tend to support their products with tutorials. If I want 50 of something I would never use adafruit, but for individual items I am fine with supporting them.
squeaky-clean 10y ago
Thanks for this info, I know Adafruit is overpriced, but had no idea where to go about doing it myself. Why do both drivers have this warning? What would make it not work with an HDMI adapter, and is there any way to somehow use this with an HDMI output? > Just to make sure this is very clear, this adapter will NOT work with HDMI connectors, will NOT work with HDMI to DisplayPort adapters (passive or active)
- kogepathic 10y ago
  > Why do both drivers have this warning? Because the LCD is an eDP (embedded DisplayPort) LCD, both Adafruit and Abusemark boards are only breakout boards to turn the FPC connection into a mini/DisplayPort port. > What would make it not work with an HDMI adapter Unlike a normal desktop monitor, which has a PCB inside with a chip that accepts a variety of inputs and drives the display in its native format (LVDS or eDP) [1], these adapters lack that. They rely on the controller inside the LP097QX1 LCD itself, which only speaks eDP because it's designed to be used in tablets which output eDP. You cannot drive the LCD at any resolution other than 2048x1536@60Hz. The LCD doesn't support any other resolution or refresh rates. > and is there any way to somehow use this with an HDMI output? No. [1] http://www.tarduino.cc/2014/10/dell-ultrasharp-24-ultra-hd-monitor.html http://www.tarduino.cc/2014/10/dell-ultrasharp-24-ultra-hd-m...
dv_dt 10y ago
I don't doubt for many products you can assemble it yourself more cheaply with the input of time. But, a price factor of 2.25 over raw parts (COGS, cost of goods sold) is pretty reasonable overhead. It's not the best margin, but it's right within reasonable for paying for assembly, inventory housing, warranty coverage, etc. For reference: https://www.eevblog.com/2016/06/03/eevblog-887-the-economics-of-selling-hardware/ https://www.eevblog.com/2016/06/03/eevblog-887-the-economics...
- Declanomous 10y ago
  I think Adafruit is pushing the limit of reasonable. The price of their products isn't terrible, but with the prices they charge I'd expect a free shipping option or something similar. Their prices are basically in line with what I would expect a retail store to charge. A mail-order warehouse has a much lower overhead per unit than a retail store. They do not need to be as well lit, the fixtures are cheaper over their lifetime, they turn over inventory much faster, products take up less space, etc. I suspect their high prices are dictated by their New York, NY location. The location may help attract talent, but it doesn't make sense to locating the warehouse for a mail-order business in the most expensive city in the United States. I don't want to suggest they shouldn't be located in NYC. That is their prerogative. I think the "Adafruit is way too expensive" argument is valid. They are insanely expensive, and while their documentation is fairly good, they are other companies that provide similar value at a price that is much lower than adafruit.
  - markokrajnc 10y ago
    Yes, they/we must pay the rent for their Manhattan location...
- kogepathic 10y ago
  > But, a price factor of 2.25 over raw parts (COGS, cost of goods sold) is pretty reasonable overhead. If this were a normal commercial product, I would agree with you. But the fact is, when you buy this Adafruit kit, you're getting the raw parts which you have to assemble, the monitor has fewer features than a normal desktop LCD monitor (only one resolution supported, only DisplayPort input) and given that it's the bare LCD, is much more fragile than a commercial monitor. So, yes, normally it is absolutely reasonable and expected for a manufacturer to charge 2-2.5x the price of raw goods. But in this case you're literally paying Adafruit 200% to do simple supply chain logistics for you, and you're getting a pile of parts which you can buy (with free shipping!) from FleaBay/AliExpress with a few clicks of your mouse.
chx 10y ago
> NOTE: FPC connector which attaches the panel to adapter board is VERY fragile. User must be very careful lifting up the connector tab and pushing it back into place. There's value in not having to fiddle with such a thing. Also, there's http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ which is more expensive but probably better. They also have a driver for the Retina MacBook http://dp2mbpr.rozsnyo.com/ http://dp2mbpr.rozsnyo.com/
- kogepathic 10y ago
  > there's http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ which is more expensive but probably better I am aware of this one as well, but what qualities make it "better" than the Abusemark model I linked to? It's 3 times more expensive ($35 versus $99), uses 12V input (and thus cannot be USB powered), and has an 8-bit micro (ATxmega32A4U) instead of the 32-bit micro found on the Abusemark board (STM32F103CB). They both feature dual backlight drivers, although rozsnyo isn't listing what driver chips they're using, I suspect it's the same as Abusemark. The Abusemark firmware even provides a USB serial device in addition to firmware updates, which the rozsnyo lacks.
elcct 10y ago
Thank you for posting this. I think paying $100 extra is not too much for saving yourself from the trouble of organising all of this. It is beautiful that the world has things for everyone to explore. I would certainly go DIY route, because I am interested in those things, but I also get that there are people who couldn't be bothered less about putting this thing together and just get the premium service.
jpt4 10y ago
Thank you very much for this detailed alternative. Echoing other commenters, I chose the Adafruit Qualia kit (not even buying the screen and driver board discrete and separate from Adafruit) as an exercise in known, commercially available components. Subsequent iterations will definitely minimize the convenience margin, so long as the resulting custom product does not suffer in functionality. The Alibaba link is live and excellent; I was for a while considering a 14" Carbon X1 screen (2560 x 1440) [0], but the 4:3 aspect ratio of the iPad Mini ultimately won out. Your Japanese connection is a good resource to have (and quite gloriously culturally shameless [1]). [0] http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-14-LP140QH1-SP-A2-with-touch-for-Lenovo-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-LP140QH1-SPA2-LCD-Display/32669866800.html?ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_0,searchweb201602_5_10017_507_401_10040,searchweb201603_9&btsid=2e9f3eb4-7b99-42ed-82ca-44a1e12b9c36 http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-14-LP140QH1-SP-A2-with-to... [1] http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=5&products_id=40 http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&...
- kennethh 10y ago
  Thanks for the links, but looks like the abusemark board is sold out. Is this the same product?: http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=48 http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&...
  - jpt4 10y ago
    I am unsure. Your link is for the STM32F303CBT6 breakout board, mine the STM32F103CBT6, but perhaps they are interchangeable.

coredog64 10y ago

I've made one as well (using the iPad housing). The most difficult part is mounting the adapter on the back: The cable from the panel is somewhat short and I had to pay an extortionate price to get the right size standoffs that were short enough not to stress the cable. It would be helpful if someone published the slot location/dimensions (hint, hint). When I started, I emailed Adafruit about selling the stand separate from the kit. They mentioned they'd take it under advisement, and that was the end of it.

jpt4 10y ago
I take it a CAD model of the stand parts would satisfy your hinted desire?

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

fhood 10y ago

I am sure that most people are aware of how overpriced adafruit is. I still use them when I prototype because they test their products, their website is a fun place to visit, and they tend to support their products with tutorials. If I want 50 of something I would never use adafruit, but for individual items I am fine with supporting them.

squeaky-clean 10y ago

Thanks for this info, I know Adafruit is overpriced, but had no idea where to go about doing it myself. Why do both drivers have this warning? What would make it not work with an HDMI adapter, and is there any way to somehow use this with an HDMI output? > Just to make sure this is very clear, this adapter will NOT work with HDMI connectors, will NOT work with HDMI to DisplayPort adapters (passive or active)

kogepathic 10y ago
> Why do both drivers have this warning? Because the LCD is an eDP (embedded DisplayPort) LCD, both Adafruit and Abusemark boards are only breakout boards to turn the FPC connection into a mini/DisplayPort port. > What would make it not work with an HDMI adapter Unlike a normal desktop monitor, which has a PCB inside with a chip that accepts a variety of inputs and drives the display in its native format (LVDS or eDP) [1], these adapters lack that. They rely on the controller inside the LP097QX1 LCD itself, which only speaks eDP because it's designed to be used in tablets which output eDP. You cannot drive the LCD at any resolution other than 2048x1536@60Hz. The LCD doesn't support any other resolution or refresh rates. > and is there any way to somehow use this with an HDMI output? No. [1] http://www.tarduino.cc/2014/10/dell-ultrasharp-24-ultra-hd-monitor.html http://www.tarduino.cc/2014/10/dell-ultrasharp-24-ultra-hd-m...

dv_dt 10y ago

I don't doubt for many products you can assemble it yourself more cheaply with the input of time. But, a price factor of 2.25 over raw parts (COGS, cost of goods sold) is pretty reasonable overhead. It's not the best margin, but it's right within reasonable for paying for assembly, inventory housing, warranty coverage, etc. For reference: https://www.eevblog.com/2016/06/03/eevblog-887-the-economics-of-selling-hardware/ https://www.eevblog.com/2016/06/03/eevblog-887-the-economics...

Declanomous 10y ago
I think Adafruit is pushing the limit of reasonable. The price of their products isn't terrible, but with the prices they charge I'd expect a free shipping option or something similar. Their prices are basically in line with what I would expect a retail store to charge. A mail-order warehouse has a much lower overhead per unit than a retail store. They do not need to be as well lit, the fixtures are cheaper over their lifetime, they turn over inventory much faster, products take up less space, etc. I suspect their high prices are dictated by their New York, NY location. The location may help attract talent, but it doesn't make sense to locating the warehouse for a mail-order business in the most expensive city in the United States. I don't want to suggest they shouldn't be located in NYC. That is their prerogative. I think the "Adafruit is way too expensive" argument is valid. They are insanely expensive, and while their documentation is fairly good, they are other companies that provide similar value at a price that is much lower than adafruit.
- markokrajnc 10y ago
  Yes, they/we must pay the rent for their Manhattan location...
kogepathic 10y ago
> But, a price factor of 2.25 over raw parts (COGS, cost of goods sold) is pretty reasonable overhead. If this were a normal commercial product, I would agree with you. But the fact is, when you buy this Adafruit kit, you're getting the raw parts which you have to assemble, the monitor has fewer features than a normal desktop LCD monitor (only one resolution supported, only DisplayPort input) and given that it's the bare LCD, is much more fragile than a commercial monitor. So, yes, normally it is absolutely reasonable and expected for a manufacturer to charge 2-2.5x the price of raw goods. But in this case you're literally paying Adafruit 200% to do simple supply chain logistics for you, and you're getting a pile of parts which you can buy (with free shipping!) from FleaBay/AliExpress with a few clicks of your mouse.

chx 10y ago

> NOTE: FPC connector which attaches the panel to adapter board is VERY fragile. User must be very careful lifting up the connector tab and pushing it back into place. There's value in not having to fiddle with such a thing. Also, there's http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ which is more expensive but probably better. They also have a driver for the Retina MacBook http://dp2mbpr.rozsnyo.com/ http://dp2mbpr.rozsnyo.com/

kogepathic 10y ago
> there's http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ http://dp2retina.rozsnyo.com/ which is more expensive but probably better I am aware of this one as well, but what qualities make it "better" than the Abusemark model I linked to? It's 3 times more expensive ($35 versus $99), uses 12V input (and thus cannot be USB powered), and has an 8-bit micro (ATxmega32A4U) instead of the 32-bit micro found on the Abusemark board (STM32F103CB). They both feature dual backlight drivers, although rozsnyo isn't listing what driver chips they're using, I suspect it's the same as Abusemark. The Abusemark firmware even provides a USB serial device in addition to firmware updates, which the rozsnyo lacks.

elcct 10y ago

Thank you for posting this. I think paying $100 extra is not too much for saving yourself from the trouble of organising all of this. It is beautiful that the world has things for everyone to explore. I would certainly go DIY route, because I am interested in those things, but I also get that there are people who couldn't be bothered less about putting this thing together and just get the premium service.

jpt4 10y ago

Thank you very much for this detailed alternative. Echoing other commenters, I chose the Adafruit Qualia kit (not even buying the screen and driver board discrete and separate from Adafruit) as an exercise in known, commercially available components. Subsequent iterations will definitely minimize the convenience margin, so long as the resulting custom product does not suffer in functionality. The Alibaba link is live and excellent; I was for a while considering a 14" Carbon X1 screen (2560 x 1440) [0], but the 4:3 aspect ratio of the iPad Mini ultimately won out. Your Japanese connection is a good resource to have (and quite gloriously culturally shameless [1]). [0] http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-14-LP140QH1-SP-A2-with-touch-for-Lenovo-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-LP140QH1-SPA2-LCD-Display/32669866800.html?ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_0,searchweb201602_5_10017_507_401_10040,searchweb201603_9&btsid=2e9f3eb4-7b99-42ed-82ca-44a1e12b9c36 http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-14-LP140QH1-SP-A2-with-to... [1] http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=5&products_id=40 http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&...

kennethh 10y ago
Thanks for the links, but looks like the abusemark board is sold out. Is this the same product?: http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=48 http://abusemark.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&...
- jpt4 10y ago
  I am unsure. Your link is for the STM32F303CBT6 breakout board, mine the STM32F103CBT6, but perhaps they are interchangeable.