Read down thread my reply to laughinghan. The implication you personally, explicitly threatened direct legal action (whether implied or not) is possibly too str

Read down thread my reply to laughinghan. The implication you personally, explicitly threatened direct legal action (whether implied or not) is possibly too strongly stated and I'm willing to rephrase that. Suggesting it was meerly stated as a preference though, is not how a reasonable person would read "you're not entitled to use" and "we are not letting other people use our name in their products". Perhaps it wasn't your intent, but the implication was clear and additionally the law follows the letter first. They "were threatened legal action with if they did" and even if you didn't actually intend to open that risk to them from yourself (as it was understood), they were still after that, at threat from others.