Oh come on, you're calling this pseudoscience and then pulling out SENS? Aubrey de Grey is in the "not even wrong" category, mainly making broad and vague claim

Oh come on, you're calling this pseudoscience and then pulling out SENS? Aubrey de Grey is in the "not even wrong" category, mainly making broad and vague claims which cannot really be tested. There was a paper on SENS in EMBO reports [1], titled "Science fact and the SENS agenda", which concluded "none of de Grey's therapies have ever been shown to extend the lifespan of any organism, let alone humans." If you want to actually talk about research into aging, stay far away from SENS, as it's not research. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371037/