3 ms·
In context, I'm pretty sure it was just saying "Unlike computation, bandwidth, and memory size, we haven't seen much improvement in latency, and even if we focu
by lostcolony 10y ago
In context, I'm pretty sure it was just saying "Unlike computation, bandwidth, and memory size, we haven't seen much improvement in latency, and even if we focused on it, we have a very clear limit we can't get past".
I.e., latency is -always- going to be an issue, for everyone doing anything distributed; it will never go away, or become so small as to effectively be ignorable. You can trim the fat, which can improve the real-world experience of certain things, but it doesn't actually solve, or even simplify, the hard edge cases. It just may make them rarer.
- deadgrey19 10y agoThe idea that latency is currently bounded by the speed of light is what stops people from fixing the fact that it is not. This is my objection.
- jsprogrammer 10y agoStating the problem might provoke people to work on fixing it?
- rubiquity 10y agoWhat is the upper bound on latency?