3 ms·
This particular article relies on shock value of a single image (hardly a graph) and is devoid of analysis, so it accomplishes nothing but inflame passions. I d
by niftich 10y ago
This particular article relies on shock value of a single image (hardly a graph) and is devoid of analysis, so it accomplishes nothing but inflame passions. I don't believe this contributes to a productive discussion (HN guidelines).
Articles that offer analysis with their statistics are more informative:
[1] (Published 2015, updated 2016-06-12) http://www.vox.com/2015/10/3/9444417/gun-violence-united-states-america http://www.vox.com/2015/10/3/9444417/gun-violence-united-sta...
[2] http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-united-states-mass-shooting-20150824-story.html http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-united-s...
[3] http://www.salon.com/2015/08/27/mass_shootings_and_the_dark_side_of_american_exceptionalism_they_happen_because_theres_a_large_gap_between_what_people_are_aspiring_to_and_what_they_can_realistically_achieve/ http://www.salon.com/2015/08/27/mass_shootings_and_the_dark_...
- _audakel 10y agoTo bad hn has a no topic downvote policy (only comment downvote) but thank you for pointing out what alot of people got caught up in / missed - this article relies on shock value of a single image (hardly a graph) and is devoid of analysis