4 ms·
The two viewpoints are completely opposed, and there is no reasonable compromise. One side says that guns designed with the obvious and explicit goal of effect
by Zikes 10y ago
The two viewpoints are completely opposed, and there is no reasonable compromise.
One side says that guns designed with the obvious and explicit goal of effectively killing numerous people should be banned so that they cannot be misused.
The other side says that guns designed with the obvious and explicit goal of effectively killing numerous people are necessary, in keeping with the Constitutional amendment which was drafted to ensure that if it ever became necessary the American citizens would once again have the means to cast off their oppressors and begin anew.
- ythl 10y ago> The other side says that guns designed with the obvious and explicit goal of effectively killing numerous people are necessary, in keeping with the Constitutional amendment which was drafted to ensure that if it ever became necessary the American citizens would once again have the means to cast off their oppressors and begin anew. Cue the progressives who claim this was not the original intent of the 2nd amendment, guns would be of no use in a revolution because the military is so crushingly powerful, etc.