> I'm highly suspicious of using an algorithm to score phrases by how close to natural language they are without a proof of security. To clarify, all the phras

> I'm highly suspicious of using an algorithm to score phrases by how close to natural language they are without a proof of security. To clarify, all the phrases to be scored represent the same random data. They are just more or less difficult to remember. The natural-language algorithm is just there to help you find one that is easy to remember, and is not security critical. The algorithm is assumed to be known to be known to the attacker in any case.