6 ms·
I don't really like how the prominent "Open Source" link at the top takes me to a page on github telling me it's currently not open source. I'd have assumed the
by kingosticks 10y ago
I don't really like how the prominent "Open Source" link at the top takes me to a page on github telling me it's currently not open source. I'd have assumed they'd "work out the kinks" faster if the source code was actually open and available.
https://help.github.com/articles/name-squatting-policy/ https://help.github.com/articles/name-squatting-policy/
EDIT: Although, maybe it's all private activity, which I guess is not visible to the likes of me.
- arbesfeld 10y ago(OP here) Hey kingosticks, appreciate this and trust me that I'd love to open source this ASAP. We're just working out our deployment story and making sure that it can scale before we open source. We don't want to force beta users to go through painful upgrades / migrations unless absolutely necessary.
- kingosticks 10y agoSounds like it might take a little while so maybe in the meantime you could just add a "coming soon" type label to the link on the home page. And don't forget that painful (exciting) upgrades is exactly what some beta users are signing up for in the first place!