3 ms·
The 747 carries ~450 passengers. The Concorde carried ~100. So, the Concorde is 4.5 times worse on a per capita basis. EDIT: Actually, ~5.4 times worse if you
by goodcanadian 10y ago
The 747 carries ~450 passengers. The Concorde carried ~100. So, the Concorde is 4.5 times worse on a per capita basis.
EDIT: Actually, ~5.4 times worse if you take into account the 1.2x difference in cost.
- ulfw 10y agoBritish Airways' 747-400 carry between 275 and 345 passengers, depending on configuration. But still. Similar in principle :) http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/information/about-ba/fleet-facts/boeing747-400 http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/information/about-ba/fle...
- goodcanadian 10y agoDepends on the airline, I suppose. Air Canada used to fly 747-100s with 400 seats: http://www.aircanada.com/en/about/fleet/historical/b747-100.html http://www.aircanada.com/en/about/fleet/historical/b747-100....