Thanks for the link, but that's the same point about the reduction of fair-use of copyrighted works. I meant the analysis of all the -other- things, besides co

Thanks for the link, but that's the same point about the reduction of fair-use of copyrighted works. I meant the analysis of all the -other- things, besides copyright harmonization, that make TPP bad, which the author refers to briefly: "There's so much in there that's about blatant protectionism and supporting certain business models over others." and "(...) other problems in the agreement (such as the corporate sovereignty provisions that will almost certainly come back to bite Google and others)." These could be good points, but since the author mentions them only in passing, and does not expand on them. After reading both links it sounds as if the author's opposition of Google's stance is entirely predicated on the copyright/fair-use topic, despite implying that TPP is deeply flawed for other reasons that should warrant its abandonment.