3 ms·
They also train for the material the stick is hitting. But yeah, it's sound transfer, not synthesis from scratch. But that's also the approach of current speec
by jobigoud 10y ago
They also train for the material the stick is hitting. But yeah, it's sound transfer, not synthesis from scratch.
But that's also the approach of current speech synthesis algorithms and works better than trying to create the waveform from scratch.
- mwcampbell 10y ago> But that's also the approach of current speech synthesis algorithms and works better than trying to create the waveform from scratch. I don't think it's that simple. Speech synthesis by concatenation does produce more natural-sounding results, at least until you notice its quirks, so casual users tend to prefer it. But I know some heavy speech synthesis users, specifically blind programmers and power-users, and they tend to prefer parametric synthesis, because it's more intelligible at high speeds.