3 ms·
>and by implication suggesting that the current targets are not really something to worry about I didn't downvote you, but this is your extrapolation and doesn
by kristiandupont 10y ago
>and by implication suggesting that the current targets are not really something to worry about
I didn't downvote you, but this is your extrapolation and doesn't necessarily imply what you suggest it does. And I am guessing that some people downvoted you because they dislike the idea that you have to add disclaimers to every statement in order not to expose yourself to judgements like yours.
- gonvaled 10y agoHe is technically wondering how long until the first strike hits the US. He is highlighting the risk that the use of drones can get out of control. Sorry, but he is implying that the fact that currently so many innocent civilians are being killed is not as worrisome. That's what I read: "look what horrible things could happen in the future". It could be that he is not really implying that, but this is what I read, and I think that this is an extremely widespread opinion, specially among american citizens. If he is not implying that, sorry but I need a disclaimer. That's what disclaimers are for: to clarify formulations which are not obvious.