> Yes, but while easier it is also less useful -- since the unsafe language we're talking about has millions of users, billions of lines of codes, tons of libra

> Yes, but while easier it is also less useful -- since the unsafe language we're talking about has millions of users, billions of lines of codes, tons of libraries, huge support, hundreds of books, great tools, etc. The safe one, not so much. Is this a plea for sticking to broken technologies 'cause social/environmental reasons?