Here's a snippet of testimony, under oath, from Gawker's chief editor. https://youtu.be/Ub80kHh5WDI?t=73 https://youtu.be/Ub80kHh5WDI?t=73 Let the enormity of

Here's a snippet of testimony, under oath, from Gawker's chief editor. https://youtu.be/Ub80kHh5WDI?t=73 https://youtu.be/Ub80kHh5WDI?t=73 Let the enormity of what he said, under oath in front of a judge and jury, sink in for a moment. The New York Times also provides a transcript and analysis here: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/business/media/gawker-editors-testimony-stuns-courtroom-in-hulk-hogan-trial.html http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/business/media/gawker-edit... Let's also take a look at an article posted by Gawker themselves regarding the trial. The title speaks for itself: "A Judge Told Us to Take Down Our Hulk Hogan Sex Tape Post. We Won't." http://gawker.com/a-judge-told-us-to-take-down-our-hulk-hogan-sex-tape-po-481328088 http://gawker.com/a-judge-told-us-to-take-down-our-hulk-hoga... Gawker made no effort whatsoever to disguise the fact they were scoundrels, so much so that the jury intentionally awarded more damages than the plaintiff asked for and the judge didn't stop them. That takes some doing. So, "Out of control"? No, not really. I'd say that Gawker worked hard to earn it.