I don't think this particular case is an issue of the "mid-point". You can avoid giving opinions and focus on the facts. In fact many good news articles are alm

I don't think this particular case is an issue of the "mid-point". You can avoid giving opinions and focus on the facts. In fact many good news articles are almost entirely facts, with a little bit of opinions in a separate section. Here is how I would outline this article: - There is this group of people who shares the same idea who are thought to be crazy. (Intro) - They have attracted some attention and grown in numbers recently. (Background) - Medical experts who study them think they are delusional. (Mainstream view) - This group of people denies such claims and provide personal recounts. (Alternative view) The violent part is only boarder line related to the main issue as it was an exception. So it should only be briefly mentioned, instead of being given an entire section.