3 ms·
The article doesn't seem to go into the actual physics too much. It instead links to a blog post [0] and another article [1] that go into more detail. I recomme
by squidlogic 10y ago
The article doesn't seem to go into the actual physics too much. It instead links to a blog post [0] and another article [1] that go into more detail. I recommend reading these over the gizmodo one.
[0] http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/physicists-on-ice-exploring-the-physics-of-curling/ http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/p...
[1] http://www.real-world-physics-problems.com/physics-of-curling.html http://www.real-world-physics-problems.com/physics-of-curlin...
- dang 10y agoNot sure if we should change the URL to the first article you've linked to; it's by the same author, but from 2014, and perhaps there's new information in the current post. Perhaps we'll just take "physics" out of the title above.