4 ms·
REALLY strange choice of data point for Toronto -- it uses a much smaller land area than for the US cities. Greater Toronto Area - 7,124 km^2 Chicago Metro Ar
by minwcnt5 10y ago
REALLY strange choice of data point for Toronto -- it uses a much smaller land area than for the US cities.
Greater Toronto Area - 7,124 km^2
Chicago Metro Area - 28,120 km^2
Houston Metro Area - 26,061 km^2
Dallas-Fort Worth - 24,059 km^2
Washington Metro - 14,412 km^2
Philadelphia Metro - 13,256 km^2
A much more apples-to-apples comparison would be the Golden Horseshoe (7.005 million / 10,097 km^2), or Greater Golden Horseshoe (8.759 million / 31,561 km^2).
I believe that Chicago's population is also stagnant, whereas the GHA has grew 4.5% from 2006-2011, so extrapolating to 2016 would put it at 9.1 million. Still smaller than the Chicago metro area, but not by a lot.
- RBO2 10y agoThese area are huge. Switzerland is 41,285 km^2, Belgium is 30,528 km^2, The Netherlands is 41,543 km^2.
- frozenport 10y agoHaving lived in Chicago, I was genuinely surprised by Belgium's comparably small size.
- sib 10y agoTry the Los Angeles metro area - 87,490 km^2 (and 18.7m people)...