7 ms·
I've read hundreds of ML papers, and this one is better than 90%, maybe even 99%. It's one of the best papers published in 2012. The authors are some of best mi
by p1esk 10y ago
I've read hundreds of ML papers, and this one is better than 90%, maybe even 99%. It's one of the best papers published in 2012. The authors are some of best minds in the field. Statements like "It is not even considered a good paper", or "very weak" need some explanation, to say the least.
The only negative thing I can say about that paper is they have not open-sourced their code.