Bullshit on correlation. They found that 25% of "toxic players" (determined by some subjective agenda) were also toxic at some level within the company. This m

Bullshit on correlation. They found that 25% of "toxic players" (determined by some subjective agenda) were also toxic at some level within the company. This means absolutely nothing if you don't compare against the equivalent rate of "employee toxicity" from "non-toxic players". 25% isn't that high; I would bet that in general 1 out of 4 LoL players have been toxic in chat at one time or another. You can't just state 25% for one side of the equation without also mentioning what results you found from the other side. I suspect that 25% of LoL players in general have been "toxic". You can't just focus only on the "bad employees" and call that correlation.