4 ms·
You'd be maybe be right, if that was the only thing that the maintainers were doing. Speaking as a maintainer of several projects myself, it's all too easy for
by weavejester 10y ago
You'd be maybe be right, if that was the only thing that the maintainers were doing. Speaking as a maintainer of several projects myself, it's all too easy for some issues to slip through the cracks.
- pdimitar 10y agoI agree. I am a maintainer myself of a closed-source & commercial project. It's indeed extremely easy to miss out on a crucial piece of info. I am not gonna teach anyone how to organize information. For the time being I am writing absolutely everything that comes to my mind (or is raised by customers and teammates) in a private Trello board. Even if I close everything in it 3 years from now, I would have some peace of mind knowing that I tried my damnest to never miss anything. And that's it's written down somewhere and that I am aware that it's waiting my input or work. I was somewhat offensive simply because bugs 7 years old marked as "wontfix" without a tangible explanation is absolutely not OK for language maintaners. The jobs of the senior devs are usually very hairy because we're good in fixing messes and repairing things. I stand behind my opinion that you have to go back and fix your past mistakes every once in a while. You can't pretend you're 18-20 years old and only sprint ahead and be blinded by the glamour of the new and shiny features. Stuff periodically needs repairing, it's how it is.
- pdimitar 10y agoWell at least I am not dowvnoted for bad language here. :D Seriously though, I don't understand why is this being downvoted on the grounds of a subjective opinion. I stand behind my philosophy and I am returning periodically to fix things I've done in my past, both in my profession and real life. You're free to disagree.