5 ms·
If you're interested in this stuff and you haven't already, you should absolutely give the Reasons from the Meads v Meads case issued by Justice Rooke a read: h
by msbarnett 10y ago
If you're interested in this stuff and you haven't already, you should absolutely give the Reasons from the Meads v Meads case issued by Justice Rooke a read: http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012ab...
It's a pretty fascinating cataloging and dissection of every fringe legal quackery he's seen or is aware of. Great read, as legal decisions go.
- kahnpro 10y agoThis decision should be the reading list of everyone who is interested in these people.
- DanBC 10y agoYes! It's brilliant. It covers everything - the weird names, the weird language, the reliance on Black's, the rejection of law, the reliance on law to attempt to force what they want, etc etc.
- jacquesm 10y agoI've been reading that for hours now, absolutely fascinating. It's like cargo-cult legalese.
- dottythechicken 10y agoit just gets worse the more you read trust me